+1 Added to my documents.
Please be aware your selection is temporary depending on your cookies policy.
Remove this selection here

Trajectory Monitoring in Portfolio Management and Issuer Intentionality Scoring

 

WP-Image page

Abstract

2°C alignment has become a major issue for climate-aware portfolio management. There are sophisticated initiatives aiming to predict corporate emission intensities from 2030 up to 2100. In this paper, we focus on the significance of the ‘current policy scenario’, where corporates would simply stay on their current trajectories for their emission intensities. The United Nations Environment Programme has illustrated how far the global current policy scenario is from a global 2°C scenario. We want to understand this ‘current policy scenario’, broken down asset-by-asset within the significant emission sectors and from a global index point of view. We will address choices of emission intensity metrics and of weighting schemes. Enabling the low-carbon transition while maintaining a long-term focus in investment decision-making is a relevant approach. In this paper we intend to illustrate the virtue of the longterm choice with a simple three-year observation gap in the power generation sector’s intensities. To complement our ‘current policy’, which focuses on the emissions trackrecord of firms, we illustrate a mosaic theory approach to quantifying the intentionality of a firm to green itself. Anticipating positive impacts requires that investors have identified their key questions for firm’s intentions.

LE GUENEDAL Theo , Quantitative Research
GIRAULT Julien , ESG Analysis
JOUANNEAU Mathieu , ESG Analysis
LEPETIT Fréderic , Quantitative Research
SEKINE Takaya , Quantitative Research

Download this article in PDF format

Send by e-mail
Trajectory Monitoring in Portfolio Management and Issuer Intentionality Scoring
Was this article helpful?YES
Thank you for your participation.
0 user(s) have answered Yes.
Related articles
Working paper
Working paper
26.08.2020 - Working Paper

Measuring and Managing Carbon Risk in Investment Portfolios

This article studies the impact of carbon risk on stock pricing. To address this, we consider the seminal approach of Görgen et al. (2019), who proposed estimating the carbon financial risk of equities by their carbon beta. To achieve this, the primary task is to develop a brown-minus-green (or BMG) risk factor, similar to Fama and French (1992). Secondly, we must estimate the carbon beta using a multi-factor model. While Görgen et al. (2019) considered that the carbon beta is constant, we propose a time-varying estimation model to assess the dynamics of the carbon risk. Moreover, we test several specifications of the BMG factor to understand which climate change-related dimensions are priced in by the stock market. In the second part of the article, we focus on the carbon risk management of investment portfolios. First, we analyze how carbon risk impacts the construction of a minimum variance portfolio. As the goal of this portfolio is to reduce unrewarded financial risks of an investment, incorporating the carbon risk into this approach fulfils this objective. Second, we propose a new framework for building enhanced index portfolios with a lower exposure to carbon risk than capitalization-weighted stock indices. Finally, we explore how carbon sensitivities can improve the robustness of factor investing portfolios.

Théo RONCALLI, Theo LE GUENEDAL, Fréderic LEPETIT, Thierry RONCALLI, Takaya SEKINE

rows