+1 Added to my documents.
Please be aware your selection is temporary depending on your cookies policy.
Remove this selection here

A good resistance of credit in spite of the rates' increase



Eurozone credit markets saw an unexpected rise in German yields. The scale and speed of the increase surprised many. However, credit held up fairly well.

The rise in sovereign yields was matched by narrower spreads. We do not regard this bond sell-off as the manifestation of a new trend but more of a correction of past excesses. The ECB's QE programme is expected to uphold a favourable technical configuration over the next few months and quarters. We are maintaining our preference for eurozone credit over dollar credit.



Eurozone credit markets saw an unexpected rise in German yields in late April. The scale and speed of the increase surprised many: a 50 bp jump in just a few trading sessions after a virtually uninterrupted decline that had continued over several quarters. The correction may be due to a combination of factors: profit-taking, a rebound in the price of oil, an improving economic outlook in the eurozone and an increase in inflation expectations. How did the credit markets react? What is the best positioning for an investor to adopt?

The upward move by the German Bund erased some of the overall gains on IG bonds.

Tensions over government bonds have weighed down the overall yield of IG bonds in the past few weeks. They erased some of the positive performance delivered since the beginning of the year: this yield plunged from 1.8% in mid-April to 0.43% by late May. Volatility was particularly high on the 7-10-year maturities and higher still for high-quality issues (AAA-AA) given their longer duration.

The good resiliency of HY should be highlighted: cumulative total yield since the beginning of the year was barely impacted by the Bund's correction. By the end of May it was 3.7%. This outstanding performance is due to the shorter duration and the wider spread of this segment. The negative contribution of the “rate effect” was offset by the positive “spread effect”.

But as far as spreads are concerned, performance is still robust.

The Bund's correction led to a tightening of credit spreads. The IG and HY bond indices narrowed 4 bp and 6 bp, respectively, between mid-April and mid-May. How do we explain such good performance from the credit markets?

As a general rule, a sharp, rapid rise in the yields of the highest-rated countries has the opposite effect on spreads. Spreads narrow as the economic outlook improves. The latest published data on eurozone growth seem to confirm the positive signals sent by macroeconomic indicators. The positive earnings reported by European businesses for Q1 confirmed the impact of the euro's depreciation relative to previous quarters (See the Weekly Letter May 11-15).

Technical factors also played a positive role during this bout of high bond volatility.

  • Activity on the primary market slowed dramatically during this bout of high bond volatility. As a reminder, the first quarter was marked by record activity in the IG segment (€130 billion in Q1 2015 vs. €108 billion in Q1 2014). This increase in activity is linked to the arrival of non-European issuers, particularly Americans, attracted by the exceptionally low interest rates (€50 billion in Q1 2015 vs €27 billion in Q1 2014).
  • Meanwhile, an analysis of the data published by EPFR attests to continued weekly flows into eurozone credit. IG credit registered positive inflows during the last weeks. The HY market also registered some inflow but in far smaller proportions.

The ECB's QE programme is just getting started

We do not regard this bond sell-off as the manifestation of a new trend but more of a correction of past excesses. 20% of the bond market was reporting negative yields before the Bund correction compared to 13% after. The ECB's QE programme is expected to uphold a favourable technical configuration over the next few months and quarters. Benoît Coeuré announced that the ECB would be temporarily frontloading its purchase activity in May and June to maintain a monthly average of €60 billion during the summer holiday period. Although he regards the recent correction as normal, he is worried about the rapidity of the reversal, which is a sign of reduced liquidity in the bond market. Remember that 85% of the QE programme has yet to be completed! We remain upbeat about credit and maintain a preference for high beta segments (HY, BBB and financials).

The divergences in the monetary policies of the ECB and the Fed, which appear to be accelerating, give us reason to show a preference for eurozone credit over dollar credit. The ECB's QE programme is expected to uphold a favourable technical configuration over the next few quarters. Any increase in the Fed funds rate not priced in by the market may have a negative impact on US risky assets (particularly equities and HY credit), which have had a major boost in recent years thanks to extremely accommodative monetary policies. Should dollar credit deliver poor performance following an increase in key interest rates, it would be a good buying opportunity as the valuations offered by US credit are more attractive than those of the eurozone. However, so far our preference remains for eurozone credit. The main risk under our scenario remains a political/economic event such as a Greek exit from the eurozone.


HY outperformed IG credit


85% of the QE programme has yet to be completed



Publication (Download)

Article in English

Article en Français

Cross Asset of June 2015 in English

Cross Asset de Juin 2015 en Français

Back up

AINOUZ Valentine , Deputy Head of Developed Markets Strategy Research
Send by e-mail
A good resistance of credit in spite of the rates' increase
Was this article helpful?YES
Thank you for your participation.
0 user(s) have answered Yes.
Related articles
2019.12 - Slider Cross Asset
2019.12 - Slider Cross Asset
06.12.2019 - Monthly Cross Asset

Corporate fundamentals are at the centre of the game

Over the last decade, easy financial conditions encouraged an increase in sovereign and corporate debt. Indeed, the leverage of American companies has reached record high levels and US corporate debt has been used for financial risk-taking to fund corporate payments to investors, as well as for mergers and acquisitions. At the opposite, the leverage of European companies has remained at low levels as European companies have remained more cautious over this cycle. In 2019, we have evolved in a new regime: the global economy has entered a synchronised slowdown and major central banks have returned to an easing stance. What are the risks for companies in this new context? We are following closely: The downgrade risk in the US Investment Grade universe. Net leverage for US issuers have resumed their upward trajectory in recent months. In 2020: (1) companies to make a trade-off between maintaining share buy backs and the stability or their debt (2) the downgrade risk to increase among firms facing increase pressure on profits. The default rate risk for low-quality high-yield bonds. Sluggish earning growth poses the biggest threat for companies to pay interest on their debt despite the low cost of financing. Indeed, at this stage of the cycle, we think that interest coverage is more closely related to earnings than to its interest expense: interest coverage could be quickly eroded by a hit to earnings. A selective approach is required in the low-rated Euro and US High Yield segments.

Valentine AINOUZ

Deputy Head of Developed Markets Strategy Research