+1 Added to my documents.
Please be aware your selection is temporary depending on your cookies policy.
Remove this selection here

Systematic Longevity Risk: To Bear or to Insure?


WP-Image page


We compare two contracts for managing systematic longevity risk in retirement: a collective arrangement that distributes the risk among participants, and a market-provided annuity contract. We evaluate the contracts’ appeal with respect to the retiree’s welfare, and the viability of the market solution through the financial reward to the annuity provider’s equityholders.
We find that individuals prefer to bear the risk under a collective arrangement than to insure it with a life insurers’annuity contract subject to insolvency risk (albeit small). Under realistic capital provision hypotheses, the annuity provider is incapable of adequately compensating its equityholders for bearing systematic longevity risk.

Amundi Working Paper - June 2018

BRIERE Marie , Head of Investor Research Center at Amundi
BOON Ling-Ni , Investor Research Center
J.M WERKER Bas , Professor of Finance and Econometrics at Tilburg University

Download this article in PDF format

Send by e-mail
Systematic Longevity Risk: To Bear or to Insure?
Was this article helpful?YES
Thank you for your participation.
0 user(s) have answered Yes.