+1 Added to my documents.
Please be aware your selection is temporary depending on your cookies policy.
Remove this selection here

Environmental Social and Governance Proposals and Shareholder Activism


WP-Image page


This chapter studies shareholder activism through environmental, social and governance (ESG) proposals between 1996 and 2015 filed by social responsible funds (“SRI”).

Larger, more mature firms with higher institutional holdings are more easily targeted by these proposals. An equal-weighted portfolio of target firms earns a four-factor alpha of 0.22% on the date of filing. Target firms with subsequent successful proposals earn higher buy-and-hold abnormal returns over the event period and have better long-term operating performances than firms whose proposals subsequently fail. Moreover, social performances of the target firms also improve.

These findings not only provide new evidence on the mechanism and outcome of shareholder activism on ESG issues but also highlight the role of SRI in effective shareholder activism. 

WEI Jiaying , ESSEC Business School

Download this article in PDF format

Send by e-mail
Environmental Social and Governance Proposals and Shareholder Activism
Was this article helpful?YES
Thank you for your participation.
0 user(s) have answered Yes.
Related articles
15.01.2012 - Working Paper

Social responsibility and mean-variance portfolio selection

This paper measures the trade-off between financial efficiency and SRI in the traditional mean-variance optimization. We compare the optimal portfolios of an SR-insensitive investor and her SR-sensitive counterpart in order to assess the cost associated with SRI. Our contribution is twofold. First, we extend the Markowitz (1952) model4 by imposing an SR threshold. This leads to four possible SR-efficient frontiers: a) the SR-frontier is the same as the non-SR frontier (i.e. no cost), b) only the left portion is penalized (i.e. a cost for high-risk-aversion investors only), c) only the right portion is penalized (i.e. a cost for low-risk aversion investors only), and d) the full frontier is penalized (i.e. a cost for all investors). Despite its crucial importance, practitioners tend to leave the investor’s risk aversion out of the SRI story. Our paper on the other hand offers a fully operational mean-variance framework for SR portfolio management, a framework that can be used for all asset classes (stocks, bonds, commodities, mutual funds, etc.). It makes explicit the consequences of any given SR threshold on the determination of the optimal  portfolio. To illustrate this, we complement our theoretical approach by an empirical application to emerging bond portfolios. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 proposes the theoretical framework forthe SR mean-variance optimization in the presence of risky assets only. Section 3 adds a riskfree asset. Section 4 applies the SRI methodology to emerging sovereign bond portfolios. Section 5 concludes.

Bastien DRUT

Fixed Income and FX Strategy